2 min read

After trying period, Ahrar al-Sham infuses leadership with ‘new blood’

A little over a year after an explosion rocked an […]

13 September 2015

A little over a year after an explosion rocked an Ahrar a-Sham meeting, killing the militia’s leader along with 30 other members of their general leadership and consultative council, interim leader Sheikh Abu Jaber has decided not to seek another term. The move, Ahrar a-Sham spokesman Ahmad Quora Ali tells Syria Direct’s Ammar Hamou, was intended to “pump new blood into the leadership.”

Q: Muhannad al-Masri (Abu Yahya) was appointed to replace Sheikh Abu Jaber, who was the sheikh for a year. Is it the policy of Ahrar to replace their leadership? Is there an internally stipulated period for their leadership?

I must point out that the most important and ruling foundation of Ahrar is the shura [consultative] council, and what occurred was a practical application of this principal. Sheikh Abu Jaber refused to extend his term, preferring to pump new blood into the leadership. So a meeting of the shura council was held and Abu Yahya was chosen.

Q: Do you have a particular basis on which you choose your leadership?

Of course we have criterion, the most important being efficiency and reputation.

Q: Sheikh Abu Jaber described the period of his leadership as the hardest since Ahrar’s founding. What is the reason for that?

Sheikh Abu Jaber’s term was indeed the hardest period that the group has gone through, because it followed the incident in which our leadership was killed, which was a strong blow to the group, but thanks to God the group has been able to hold itself together, to overcome the crisis and strengthen itself anew. 

Share this article