4 min read  | Interviews, Politics

Idris ally says SMC ‘wants to direct the revolution from abroad’


February 20, 2014

February 20, 2014

On Sunday, the Free Syrian Army’s (FSA) Supreme Military Council (SMC) announced that it had fired its Chief of Staff, General Salim Idris, citing “the paralysis within the military structure these past months.” The SMC replaced Idris with Abdelilah al-Bashir, head of the military council in the southern province of Quneitra. 

On Wednesday, Idris released a video statement in which he is surrounded by members of the FSA’s Joint Command—a subordinate body of the SMC—rejecting his dismissal as “illegitimate and illegal” as well as “improvised and personal.” He goes on to announce that the leaders appearing in the video have decided to “cut all ties” with the Syrian opposition’s temporary government in exile, and calls on all rebel fighters to join a new structure under his command.

Colonel Fateh Hassoun is the leader of the FSA’s Central Front, a member of the FSA’s Joint Command and one of the officers appearing in Idriss’s video statement. He tells Syria Direct’s Osama Abu Zeid that al-Bashir “is not the man for this time” and warns that Idriss’s dismissal has “driven a wedge” into the armed opposition at a critical juncture.

Screen_Shot_2014-02-20_at_2.31.35_PM.pngColonel Fateh Hassoun, center, rejected Gen. Idris’s dismissal in a video Wednesday.
Photo courtesy of xeber24.net.

Q: What’s your opinion of the SMC’s decision to remove Salim Idriss and appoint al-Bashir as head of the Chiefs of Staff? 

I reject it completely. It was an illegitimate, stubborn and unilateral decision from the SMC; it’s driven a wedge between opposition fighters. I think his removal reflects the personal inclinations of certain SMC members—it looks like a settling of scores.

Q: Why do you think al-Bashir was appointed as Idriss’s replacement?

We don’t know anything about him except that he has an honorable background, but he’s not the leader we need at this stage. The sacking and replacement took [the SMC] ten minutes—al-Bashir himself found out from watching television, so just imagine how the people who made this decision were working.

Q: Many people are talking about the SMC and the Joint Command but don’t have a clear understanding of the difference. Can you clarify?

The Joint Command is composed of five geographic fronts, and each front has a military leader and a civilian deputy. Each of the five fronts is overseen by six members of the Supreme Military Council [also called the Council of 30]. The system allows for a two-thirds majority of the Supreme Military Council, with agreement from the Minister of Defense, to remove and appoint the Chief of Staff. This is the group that removed Idris, and it’s important to know that only a few of them are present on the ground, and the rest live in Turkey or other Arab states.

General Salim leads the part of the Joint Command that controls our supplies, distributing them to the leaders of all five fronts. Each of these leaders has its system for distributing the supplies he has received to military councils throughout Syria. The head of each council has an office for managing and distributing supplies to the brigades in his area.

Q: Is this a coup against the Joint Command, as some have suggested?

Of course not—General Salim was the only one removed, the rest of the military leadership is still in place.

Q: Why have we seen so many groups distancing themselves from the FSA and joining the Islamic Front and other formations? 

The reason is the Council of 30 [the SMC], which is obstinate and doesn’t have a real presence on the ground. It wants to direct the revolution from abroad, and that’s why there have been groups moving toward the Islamists. This has led to the fragmentation of the Joint Command. The solution for us is to cut our ties with [the SMC] and the Defense Minister, which is what we announced today. This means becoming independent of the SMC, which lives in exile and undermines many of the actors on the ground.

Q: Do you expect that these developments will have a major impact on the battles that the FSA is fighting, including the rebels’ “Qadimoun” offensive in Homs and Hama?

I hope not. Yesterday the Qadimoun campaign achieved a major victory, and today all of the leaders in Qadimoun’s operations room issued a recorded statement rejecting General Salim’s removal. If the situation continues like this—with one side dismissing someone and the other side rejecting—of course this will affect the battles. The Joint Command has been endangered by Idriss’s removal, and by the contradictory positions of the Defense Minister and the Coalition.

Q: What can you tell me about the ongoing battle for Yabroud? Is the FSA in a strong position to push back the government-Hezbollah advance?

Thank God, the news from Yabroud is good, and our chances are strong. But we need reinforcements there, and they have been cut off because of the problems with the Joint Command. The SMC has cut off supplies to [Idris] at this critical time, preventing the delivery of ammunition to the revolutionaries. 

For more from Syria Direct, like us on Facebook or follow us on Twitter. 

More Latest…